- Top 10 in Tech Center 1600
- Top 10 in Tech Center 1700
- Top 10 in Tech Center 2100
- Top 10 in Tech Center 2400
- Top 10 in Tech Center 2600
- Top 10 in Tech Center 2800
- Top 10 in Tech Center 3600
- Top 10 in Tech Center 3700
Top 10 Patent Firms in Tech Center 1600.
Technology Center 1600 covers patent applications in the fields of Biotechnology and Organic fields. Congratulations to WCF IP for earning the top Patent Bots Quality Ranking in Tech Center 1600 for 2023!
Rank | Firm | Count | Score |
1 | WCF IP | 79 | 98.9 |
2 | Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP | 106 | 96.7 |
3 | Sughrue Mion, PLLC | 249 | 95.1 |
4 | Oblon, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, L.L.P. | 235 | 94.5 |
5 | Ballard Spahr LLP | 77 | 94.5 |
6 | Merchant & Gould P.C. | 59 | 94.4 |
7 | Quarles & Brady LLP | 125 | 92.9 |
8 | Myers Bigel, P.A. | 94 | 92.8 |
9 | Bayramoglu Law Offices LLC | 55 | 92.3 |
10 | Casimir Jones, S.C. | 150 | 90.5 |
Top 10 Patent Firms in Tech Center 1700.
Technology Center 1700 covers patent applications in the fields of Chemical and Materials Engineering fields. Congratulations to Global IP Counselors for earning the top Patent Bots Quality Ranking in Tech Center 1700 for 2023!
Rank | Firm | Count | Score |
1 | Global IP Counselors, LLP | 60 | 98.8 |
2 | Amin, Turocy & Watson, LLP | 84 | 96.5 |
3 | ScienBiziP, P.C. | 64 | 94.8 |
4 | Kenja IP Law PC | 137 | 93.7 |
5 | Thorpe North & Western | 133 | 93.6 |
6 | McGarry Bair PC | 52 | 92.8 |
7 | McDermott Will & Emery LLP | 177 | 92.3 |
8 | Staas & Halsey LLP | 63 | 92.2 |
9 | Moser Taboada | 61 | 91.1 |
10 | Baker Botts L.L.P. | 55 | 91.1 |
Top 10 Patent Firms in Tech Center 2100.
Technology Center 2100 covers patent applications in the fields of Computer Architecture Software and Information Security. Congratulations to Harrity & Harrity for earning the top Patent Bots Quality Rankings in Tech Center 2100 for 2023!
Rank | Firm | Count | Score |
1 | Harrity & Harrity, LLP | 53 | 99.9 |
2 | Holland & Hart LLP | 214 | 99.8 |
3 | Commvault Systems, Inc. | 68 | 99.2 |
4 | Konrad Raynes Davda & Victor LLP | 83 | 96.5 |
5 | FIG. 1 Patents | 71 | 95.7 |
6 | Moore & Van Allen PLLC | 68 | 95.1 |
7 | Volentine, Whitt & Francos, PLLC | 54 | 92.8 |
8 | Alleman Hall Creasman & Tuttle LLP | 50 | 92.6 |
9 | Muirhead and Saturnelli, LLC | 82 | 90.3 |
10 | Garlick & Markison | 77 | 90.2 |
Top 10 Patent Firms in Tech Center 2400.
Technology Center 2400 covers patent applications in the fields of Computer Networks, Multiplex, Cable and Cryptography/Security. Congratulations to The Pattani Law Group for earning the top Patent Bots Quality Ranking in Tech Center 2400 for 2023!
Rank | Firm | Count | Score |
1 | The Pattani Law Group | 52 | 100 |
2 | Harrity & Harrity, LLP | 309 | 99.9 |
3 | Harrity & Harrity LLP/Qualcomm Incorporated | 57 | 99.8 |
4 | Holland & Hart LLP | 451 | 99.7 |
5 | Holland & Hart LLP/Qualcomm Incorporated | 68 | 98.6 |
6 | Edell, Shapiro & Finnan, LLC | 138 | 98.2 |
7 | Moore & Van Allen PLLC | 103 | 93.9 |
8 | Cooper Legal Group, LLC | 65 | 93.7 |
9 | Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch LLP | 136 | 93.4 |
10 | Osha Bergman Watanabe & Burton LLP | 233 | 92.3 |
Top 10 Patent Firms in Tech Center 2600.
Technology Center 2600 covers patent applications in the fields of Communications. Congratulations to Holland & Hart for earning the top Patent Bots Quality Ranking in Tech Center 2600 for 2023!
Rank | Firm | Count | Score |
1 | Holland & Hart LLP | 136 | 99.9 |
2 | FIG. 1 Patents | 80 | 99.5 |
3 | Alleman Hall Creasman & Tuttle LLP | 81 | 99 |
4 | Harrity & Harrity, LLP | 108 | 98.4 |
5 | Kile Park Reed & Houtteman PLLC | 88 | 98.2 |
6 | Edell, Shapiro & Finnan, LLC | 84 | 96.9 |
7 | Ferguson Braswell Fraser Kubasta PC | 53 | 96.7 |
8 | Pierce Atwood LLP | 123 | 95.8 |
9 | Esplin & Associates, PC | 57 | 95.4 |
10 | Global IP Counselors, LLP | 60 | 95.3 |
Top 10 Patent Firms in Tech Center 2800.
Technology Center 2800 covers patent applications in the fields of Semiconductors, Electrical and Optical Systems and Components. Congratulations to GTC Law Group for earning the top Patent Bots Quality Ranking in Tech Center 2800 for 2023!
Rank | Firm | Count | Score |
1 | GTC Law Group PC & Affiliates | 63 | 100 |
2 | Intellectual Valley Law, P.C. | 64 | 99.8 |
3 | Holland & Hart LLP | 193 | 99.6 |
4 | Akona IP PC | 96 | 99.2 |
5 | Chip Law Group | 224 | 97.6 |
6 | PV IP PC | 77 | 96.9 |
7 | Patent Capital Group | 66 | 96.5 |
8 | Alleman Hall Creasman & Tuttle LLP | 76 | 96 |
9 | Moser Taboada | 63 | 95.5 |
10 | Lanway IPR Services | 92 | 95.3 |
Top 10 Patent Firms in Tech Center 3600.
Technology Center 3600 covers patent applications in the fields of Transportation, Electronic Commerce, Construction, Agriculture, Licensing and Review. Congratulations to Harrity & Harrity for earning the top Patent Bots Quality Ranking in Tech Center 3600 for 2023!
Rank | Firm | Count | Score |
1 | Harrity & Harrity, LLP | 103 | 99.9 |
2 | Keating & Bennett, LLP | 84 | 99.8 |
3 | Posz Law Group, PLC | 52 | 99.2 |
4 | Mori & Ward, LLP | 50 | 98.9 |
5 | Bejin Bieneman PLC | 169 | 98.6 |
6 | The Small Patent Law Group LLC | 100 | 97.9 |
7 | Darrow Mustafa PC | 132 | 97.4 |
8 | Paratus Law Group, PLLC | 61 | 96.1 |
9 | Caldwell Intellectual Property Law | 124 | 96 |
10 | BCF LLP | 57 | 95.0 |
Top 10 Patent Firms in Tech Center 3700.
Technology Center 3700 covers patent applications in the fields of Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing and Products. Congratulations to McCoy Russell for earning the top Patent Bots Quality Ranking in Tech Center 3700 for 2023!
Rank | Firm | Count | Score |
1 | McCoy Russell LLP | 285 | 99.5 |
2 | Getz Balich LLC | 77 | 99.2 |
3 | Mayer & Williams PC | 97 | 98.9 |
4 | Rabin & Berdo, P.C. | 56 | 98.8 |
5 | Paratus Law Group, PLLC | 60 | 98.7 |
6 | ScienBiziP, P.C. | 54 | 97.5 |
7 | WHDA, LLP | 81 | 96.9 |
8 | Lempia Summerfield Katz LLC | 109 | 96.6 |
9 | Snell & Wilmer L.L.P. | 156 | 96.1 |
10 | Osha Bergman Watanabe & Burton LLP | 170 | 96.0 |
Patent Quality Rankings Methodology.
The Patent Quality Rankings are based only on average errors in issued patents and don't address other important aspects of patent quality.
For purpose of computing quality scores, we used only numbering errors, antecedent basis errors, and word support errors (words that don't appear in the detailed description).
Although we may over- or under-count errors in an individual patent, the average number of errors across all of a firm's patents is a good indicator of the overall quality of the firm's work.
Learn more about our methodology.