Webinar: Drafting to Due Diligence

Due diligence work requires reviewing and comparing a wide variety of information (claims, office actions, etc.), and doing this manually is slow and tedious. 

In this webinar, GTC Law Group shares how they use tools like PatentPlex to get quick access to the information they need, allowing them to spend more time on substantive work and less time shuffling papers. 

As a bonus, GTC Law Group is also #1 in the 2025 Patent Bots quality rankings as measured by proofreading errors in issued patents. 

During the presentation, GTC explains the importance of patent quality and the processes that they have implemented to ensure the entire law firm is doing quality work. 

Patent Bots Drafting Automation in Action: Claims Renumbering

You may know Prep & Pros Pro from Patent Bots for automated proofreading, but did you know that it includes drafting automation as well?

These tools increase your efficiency by automating tedious tasks when drafting patent applications and OA responses. Drafting automation includes the following features designed to save you valuable time and reduce errors. 

• Claim renumbering
• Insertion or removal of ref labels from claims
• Figure renumbering
• Typing shortcuts for ref labels
• Ref label renumbering
• Generation of claim summaries
• Generation of the brief description of the figures

Today, we’re taking a closer look at claim renumbering and sharing just how easy it is to use.  With one click of a button, the tool makes sure that all of your claims are in numerical order and automatically updates your claim dependencies.

See claim renumbering in action in the video below.  Then try it, along with the other great drafting features, with a free two-week trial of Patent Bots.

2025 Patent Quality Rankings: Top 10 Firms in Each USPTO Tech Center

Patent Bots recently announced its latest Patent Quality Rankings of top patent law firms. In April, we unveiled the Top 50 Patent Firms. 

Today, we're excited to share the Top 10 firms in each USPTO Tech Center. 

As we've done every year since 2020, we used our advanced machine learning software to review every patent issued – more than 314,00 this year! – by the USPTO in the past year. 

We then ranked patent firms in each Tech Center based on the average number of numbering, antecedent basis, and word support errors detected in their patents. Our rankings are based only on the above errors and do not address many other important aspects of patent quality.

More than 275,000 (88%) of patents issued contained at least one detectable error. If your firm doesn't use automated proofreading, try Patent Bots FREE for 14 days.

Now, on to the rankings! 

Top 10 Patent Firms in Tech Center 1600

Technology Center 1600 covers patent applications in the fields of Biotechnology and Organic fields. Congratulations to Nath, Goldberg & Myer for earning the top Patent Bots Quality Ranking in Tech Center 1600 for 2025.

RANK	FIRM	COUNT	SCORE
1	Nath, Goldberg & Meyer	373	100
2	Tarolli, Sundheim, Covell & Tummino LLP	50	98.9
3	Sughrue Mion, PLLC	176	98.8
4	Perkins Coie LLP	60	93
5	Meunier Carlin & Curfman LLC	103	92.9
6	Oblon, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, L.L.P.	177	92.7
7	Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP	101	89.7
8	Choate, Hall & Stewart LLP	62	89.1
9	Fox Rothschild LLP	99	86.2
10	Polsinelli PC	146	82.2

Top 10 Patent Firms in Tech Center 1700

Technology Center 1700 covers patent applications in the fields of Chemical and Materials Engineering fields. Congratulations to KENJAR IP LAW PC for earning the top Patent Bots Quality Ranking in Tech Center 1700 for 2025. 

RANK	FIRM	COUNT	SCORE
1	KENJA IP LAW PC	119	99.5
2	Global IP Counselors, LLP	52	97.8
3	BURR PATENT LAW, PLLC	71	97
4	Slater Matsil, LLP	70	94.2
5	Nath, Goldberg & Meyer	185	93.8
6	Lee IP Law, P.C.	62	93.1
7	IPUSA, PLLC	58	92.6
8	Rimon P.C.	154	92.1
9	Fish & Richardson P.C.	368	90
10	Wenderoth, Lind & Ponack, L.L.P.	246	89.8

Top 10 Patent Firms in Tech Center 2100

Technology Center 2100 covers patent applications in the fields of Computer Architecture Software and Information Security. Congratulations to FIG. 1 Patents for earning the top Patent Bots Quality Rankings in Tech Center 2100 for 2025.

RANK	FIRM	COUNT	SCORE
1	FIG. 1 Patents	79	99.9
2	Harrity & Harrity, LLP	93	99.7
3	Holland & Hart LLP	295	99.7
4	Commvault Systems, Inc.	55	99.6
5	Flagship Patents	50	98.3
6	Renaissance IP Law Group LLP	63	95.7
7	Jaffery Watson Mendonsa & Hamilton LLP	83	95.4
8	Lowenstein Sandler LLP	255	92.7
9	Keller Preece PLLC	71	91
10	Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP	76	90.9

Top 10 Patent Firms in Tech Center 2400

Technology Center 2400 covers patent applications in the fields of Computer Networks, Multiplex, Cable and Cryptography/Security. Congratulations to Harrity & Harrity, LLP for earning the top Patent Bots Quality Ranking in Tech Center 2400 for 2025.

RANK	FIRM	COUNT	SCORE
1	Harrity & Harrity, LLP	485	99.9
2	BEHMKE INNOVATION GROUP LLC	85	99.9
3	Edell, Shapiro & Finnan, LLC	102	99.5
4	The Pattani Law Group	71	99.5
5	Holland & Hart LLP	659	99.3
6	QUALCOMM Incorporated	211	97.8
7	Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch LLP	221	97
8	Osha Bergman Watanabe & Burton LLP	215	96.6
9	ArentFox Schiff LLP	390	95.9
10	Shumaker & Sieffert, P.A.	275	91.7

Top 10 Patent Firms in Tech Center 2600

Technology Center 2600 covers patent applications in the fields of Communications. Congratulations to Harrity & Harrity, LLP for earning the top Patent Bots Quality Ranking in Tech Center 2600 for 2025.

RANK	FIRM	COUNT	SCORE
1	Harrity & Harrity, LLP	174	99.9
2	FIG. 1 Patents	90	99.9
3	Holland & Hart LLP	148	99.1
4	Kubota & Basol LLP	72	99
5	Jaffery Watson Mendonsa & Hamilton LLP	62	98.2
6	Weaver Austin Villeneuve & Sampson LLP	53	97.7
7	Keller Preece PLLC	93	97.4
8	Garlick & Markison	60	96.7
9	CKC & Partners Co., LLC	64	96.1
10	Edell, Shapiro & Finnan, LLC	64	96

Top 10 Patent Firms in Tech Center 2800

Technology Center 2800 covers patent applications in the fields of Semiconductors, Electrical and Optical Systems and Components. Congratulations to Holland & Hart LLP for earning the top Patent Bots Quality Ranking in Tech Center 2800 for 2025.

RANK	FIRM	COUNT	SCORE
1	Holland & Hart LLP	157	99.6
2	CHIP LAW GROUP	230	99.4
3	Garlick & Markison	58	99.3
4	Akona IP PC	87	97.9
5	Venjuris, P.C.	139	97.4
6	Robinson Intellectual Property Law Office, P.C.	124	97
7	Innovation Counsel LLP	134	96.4
8	Cha & Reiter, LLC	73	95.2
9	Jefferson IP Law, LLP	117	95.1
10	Lowenstein Sandler LLP	166	95.1

Top 10 Patent Firms in Tech Center 3600

Technology Center 3600 covers patent applications in the fields of Transportation, Electronic Commerce, Construction, Agriculture, Licensing and Review. Congratulations to Harrity & Harrity, LLP for earning the top Patent Bots Quality Ranking in Tech Center 3600 for 2025.

RANK	FIRM	COUNT	SCORE
1	Harrity & Harrity, LLP	113	99.6
2	Keating & Bennett, LLP	167	99.5
3	The Small Patent Law Group LLC	61	99.3
4	BCF LLP	61	99.1
5	Burris Law, PLLC	55	98.6
6	Darrow Mustafa PC	51	97.6
7	Paratus Law Group, PLLC	81	97
8	Young Basile Hanlon & MacFarlane, P.C.	144	96.4
9	IPUSA, PLLC	83	95.8
10	Bejin Bieneman PLC	126	95.3

Top 10 Patent Firms in Tech Center 3700

Technology Center 3700 covers patent applications in the fields of Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing and Products. Congratulations to Getz Balich LLC for earning the top Patent Bots Quality Ranking in Tech Center 3700 for 2025.

RANK	FIRM	COUNT	SCORE
1	Getz Balich LLC	167	100
2	STAAS & HALSEY LLP	75	99.8
3	Paratus Law Group, PLLC	52	99.5
4	Posz Law Group, PLC	124	98.5
5	Burris Law, PLLC	73	97.6
6	Keating & Bennett, LLP	50	96.1
7	Lempia Summerfield Katz LLC	111	94.1
8	Slater Matsil, LLP	56	94.1
9	McGarry Bair PC	92	94
10	Rimon P.C.	104	93.1

Patent Quality Rankings Methodology

The Patent Quality Rankings are based only on average errors in issued patents and don't address other important aspects of patent quality. 

For the purpose of computing quality scores, we used only numbering errors, antecedent basis errors, and word support errors (words that don't appear in the detailed description).

Although we may over- or under-count errors in an individual patent, the average number of errors across all of a firm's patents is a good indicator of the overall quality of the firm's work. 

Learn more about our methodology.