2024 Patent Quality Rankings: Top 10 Firms in Each USPTO Tech Center

Patent Bots recently announced its fifth annual Patent Quality Rankings of top patent law firms. In April, we unveiled the Top 50 Patent Firms. 

Today, we'll announce the Top 10 firms in each USPTO Tech Center. 

As we've done every year since 2020, we used our advanced machine learning software to review every patent issued – nearly 324,000 this year! – by the USPTO in the past year. 

We then ranked patent firms in each Tech Center based on the average number of numbering, antecedent basis, and word support errors detected in their patents. Our rankings are based only on the above errors and do not address many other important aspects of patent quality.

Nearly 287,000 (88%) of patents contained at least one detectable error. If your firm doesn't use automated proofreading, try Patent Bots FREE for 14 days.

Now, on to the rankings! 

2024 Patent Quality Rankings: Top 10 Firms by USPTO Tech Center.

Keep scrolling to view the Top 10 Firms in every USPTO Tech Center. Or, select a Tech Center of interest from the list to jump to that section. 

• Top 10 in Tech Center 1600
• Top 10 in Tech Center 1700
• Top 10 in Tech Center 2100
• Top 10 in Tech Center 2400
• Top 10 in Tech Center 2600
• Top 10 in Tech Center 2800
• Top 10 in Tech Center 3600
• Top 10 in Tech Center 3700

Top 10 Patent Firms in Tech Center 1600.

Technology Center 1600 covers patent applications in the fields of Biotechnology and Organic fields. Congratulations to Nath, Goldberg & Meyer for earning the top Patent Bots Quality Ranking in Tech Center 1600 for 2024!

Rank	Firm	Count	Score
1	Nath, Goldberg & Meyer	241	98.8
2	TAROLLI, SUNDHEIM, COVELL & TUMMINO L.L.P.	50	98
3	Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP	111	95.3
4	Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP	88	94.3
5	Sughrue Mion, PLLC	198	93.7
6	Dinsmore & Shohl LLP	66	89.3
7	Meunier Carlin & Curfman LLC	109	88.8
8	Banner & Witcoff, Ltd.	64	87.6
9	Ballard Spahr LLP	59	86.5
10	Greenberg Traurig, LLP	97	86.4

Top 10 Patent Firms in Tech Center 1700.

Technology Center 1700 covers patent applications in the fields of Chemical and Materials Engineering fields. Congratulations to CKC & Partners Co. for earning the top Patent Bots Quality Ranking in Tech Center 1700 for 2024! 

Rank	Firm	Count	Score
1	CKC & Partners Co., LLC	58	98.9
2	Lempia Summerfield Katz LLC	51	97.1
3	ScienBiziP, P.C.	51	96.4
4	Global IP Counselors, LLP	73	94.9
5	KENJA IP LAW PC	96	94.4
6	Li & Cai Intellectual Property (USA) Office	50	93.5
7	McGarry Bair PC	78	92.3
8	Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP	58	91.5
9	NSIP Law	58	91.4
10	Lee IP Law, P.C.	75	91

Top 10 Patent Firms in Tech Center 2100.

Technology Center 2100 covers patent applications in the fields of Computer Architecture Software and Information Security. Congratulations to Holland & Hart for earning the top Patent Bots Quality Rankings in Tech Center 2100 for 2024!

Rank	Firm	Count	Score
1	Holland & Hart LLP	326	99.9
2	FIG. 1 Patents	82	99.6
3	Commvault Systems, Inc.	60	99.6
4	Harrity & Harrity, LLP	61	99.5
5	Lowenstein Sandler LLP	436	93.5
6	Young Basile Hanlon & MacFarlane, P.C.	57	93
7	Muirhead and Saturnelli, LLC	56	92.6
8	Garlick & Markison	91	92.4
9	Patterson + Sheridan, LLP	217	91.8
10	Renaissance IP Law Group LLP	72	91.8

Top 10 Patent Firms in Tech Center 2400.

Technology Center 2400 covers patent applications in the fields of Computer Networks, Multiplex, Cable and Cryptography/Security. Congratulations to Harrity & Harrity for earning the top Patent Bots Quality Ranking in Tech Center 2400 for 2024!

Rank	Firm	Count	Score
1	Harrity & Harrity, LLP	639	99.9
2	Edell, Shapiro & Finnan, LLC	138	99.9
3	Holland & Hart LLP	781	99.8
4	The Pattani Law Group	135	99.6
5	Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch LLP	226	99.1
6	BEHMKE INNOVATION GROUP LLC	100	98.4
7	QUALCOMM Incorporated	228	98.2
8	ArentFox Schiff LLP	439	97.7
9	Moore & Van Allen PLLC	96	95.5
10	ScienBiziP, P.C.	169	91.3

Top 10 Patent Firms in Tech Center 2600.

Technology Center 2600 covers patent applications in the fields of Communications. Congratulations to Harrity & Harrity for earning the top Patent Bots Quality Ranking in Tech Center 2600 for 2024!

Rank	Firm	Count	Score
1	Harrity & Harrity, LLP	181	99.8
2	FIG. 1 Patents	86	99.6
3	Edell, Shapiro & Finnan, LLC	79	98.5
4	Holland & Hart LLP	159	98
5	KILE PARK REED & HOUTTEMAN PLLC	102	97.8
6	Garlick & Markison	57	97
7	Innovation Counsel LLP	165	96.7
8	QUALCOMM Incorporated	224	96.5
9	Alleman Hall Creasman & Tuttle LLP	110	96.3
10	Pierce Atwood LLP	129	96.2

Top 10 Patent Firms in Tech Center 2800.

Technology Center 2800 covers patent applications in the fields of Semiconductors, Electrical and Optical Systems and Components. Congratulations to Garlick & Markison for earning the top Patent Bots Quality Ranking in Tech Center 2800 for 2024!

Rank	Firm	Count	Score
1	Garlick & Markison	52	99.8
2	Holland & Hart LLP	242	99.3
3	Akona IP	114	98.6
4	MUGHAL GAUDRY & FRANKLIN PC	79	97.9
5	CHIP LAW GROUP	180	97.6
6	Lee Sullivan Shea & Smith LLP	84	97.4
7	Venjuris, P.C.	113	96.7
8	KILE PARK REED & HOUTTEMAN PLLC	229	96.6
9	Quinn IP Law	56	95.9
10	IPUSA, PLLC	141	95.6

Top 10 Patent Firms in Tech Center 3600.

Technology Center 3600 covers patent applications in the fields of Transportation, Electronic Commerce, Construction, Agriculture, Licensing and Review. Congratulations to GTC Law Group for earning the top Patent Bots Quality Ranking in Tech Center 3600 for 2024!

Rank	Firm	Count	Score
1	GTC Law Group PC & Affiliates	52	99.8
2	FIG. 1 Patents	56	99.8
3	BCF LLP	58	99.4
4	Bejin Bieneman PLC	165	99.3
5	Harrity & Harrity, LLP	121	99.2
6	Alleman Hall Creasman & Tuttle LLP	58	99
7	Keating & Bennett, LLP	98	98.7
8	Darrow Mustafa PC	103	98.1
9	Paratus Law Group, PLLC	60	96.7
10	Parker Justiss, P.C.	61	96.2

Top 10 Patent Firms in Tech Center 3700.

Technology Center 3700 covers patent applications in the fields of Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing and Products. Congratulations to Getz Balich for earning the top Patent Bots Quality Ranking in Tech Center 3700 for 2024!

Rank	Firm	Count	Score
1	Getz Balich LLC	124	99.8
2	Keating & Bennett, LLP	56	99.8
3	POSZ LAW GROUP, PLC	109	99
4	Alleman Hall Creasman & Tuttle LLP	72	98.9
5	Lempia Summerfield Katz LLC	145	98.3
6	McCoy Russell LLP	212	97.2
7	Gray Ice Higdon	50	97.1
8	Amin, Turocy & Watson, LLP	79	96.9
9	Snell & Wilmer L.L.P.	155	96.6
10	Paratus Law Group, PLLC	57	96

Patent Quality Rankings Methodology. 

The Patent Quality Rankings are based only on average errors in issued patents and don't address other important aspects of patent quality. 

For purpose of computing quality scores, we used only numbering errors, antecedent basis errors, and word support errors (words that don't appear in the detailed description).

Although we may over- or under-count errors in an individual patent, the average number of errors across all of a firm's patents is a good indicator of the overall quality of the firm's work. 

Learn more about our methodology.

Product Updates: IDS Form Filling Enhancements and More

Since launching IDS Form Filling six months ago, we’ve rolled out several enhancements that you may have missed. In our upcoming webinar, you’ll learn how to …

• Import all references cited in any public patent (US or foreign) or even import the whole family.
• See a list of previously cited references. We won't add previously cited references to the IDS form.
• Export your IDS Form as PDF, Word (convert to PDF for submission), or XLS (for your own records).

At the 5:55 mark of the video below, you'll see all the latest enhancements to IDS Form Filling.

IDS Form Filling is available now as part of a Patent Bots Prep & Pros Pro subscription.

IDS Form Filling Enhancements and More from Patent Bots on Vimeo.

2024 Patent Quality Rankings: The Top 50 Patent Law Firms

It's been five years since we first sought to quantify the state of patent accuracy in the U.S. Today, Patent Bots is pleased to announce our FIFTH annual Patent Quality Rankings of top patent law firms!

As we've done every year since 2020, we used our advanced machine learning software to review every patent issued – nearly 324,000 this year! – by the USPTO in the past year. 

We then ranked the 730 patent law firms with 50+ patents issued based on the average number of numbering, antecedent basis, and word support errors detected in their patents. Our rankings are based only on these error types and do not address many other important aspects of patent quality. 

Patent Accuracy: By the Numbers.

Before we unveil the top 50 patent law firms, let's take a look at the state of patent accuracy.

• 323,820 patents processed by the Patent Bots AI
• 36,824 (11.4%) patents with a perfect Patent Quality Score – up from 10.3% in 2023
• 6.75 average errors per patent – down from 7.9 in 2023
• 4 median errors per patent – down from 5 in 2023

The decline in errors per patent is not a one-year phenomenon. In fact, the average has declined nearly 25% in just five years – from 8.9 errors per patent in 2020 to an all-time low of 6.75 this year.

The decrease coincides with the rise of automated patent proofreading tools like Patent Bots Prep & Pros Pro. As more patent attorneys have implemented these tools into their workflows, the prevalence of errors has decreased steadily – and dramatically – year after year. 

That said, nearly 287,000 (88%) of all patents issued in the last year contained at least one numbering, antecedent basis, or word support error. If your firm doesn't use automated proofreading, try Patent Bots FREE for 14 days.

Now, on to the rankings!

2024 Patent Quality Rankings: Top 10 Large Firms.

We've segmented America's most active patent firms (those with at least 500 patents issued in the last year) into a Large Firms list to recognize their prolific patent practices. 

For the full Top 50 ranking of patent firms, keep scrolling! 

For the third consecutive year, Harrity & Harrity held the top spot in the rankings. Congratulations to Harrity & Harrity and the rest of these large firms for doing amazing work over the last year! 

(A quick note about the rankings: Some companies file their own patents rather than filing through outside counsel. In these instances, the company is both the patent filer AND the patent owner and is included in our rankings as both a firm and a company. The company rankings will be released later this year.)

Rank	Law Firm	Patents Issued	Quality Score
1	Harrity & Harrity, LLP	1274	98.9
2	Holland & Hart LLP	1596	97.1
3	QUALCOMM Incorporated	538	96.3
4	Global IP Counselors, LLP	559	88.9
5	Patterson + Sheridan, LLP	1591	88.7
6	Keating & Bennett, LLP	644	85.8
7	CHIP LAW GROUP	711	85.5
8	Lowenstein Sandler LLP	1054	< 85.2
9	Rankin, Hill & Clark LLP	605	< 85.2
10	Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch LLP	748	< 85.2

2024 Patent Quality Rankings: Top 50 Firms Overall. 

Large firms don't have a monopoly on patent accuracy. In our Top 50 overall rankings, 43 firms had fewer than 500 patents issued, 31 had fewer than 200 issued, and 14 had fewer than 100 issued. 

Congratulations to Patent Bots customer FIG. 1 Patents for jumping all the way from No. 8 in our 2023 rankings to the top of our 2024 list. 

(If you don't see your firm on the list below, review our full list inside our PatentVerse. You'll need to log in to see your firm's ranking as we don't want to publicly identify firms with lower scores.)

Rank	Law Firm	Patents Issued	Quality Score
1	FIG. 1 Patents	266	99.6
2	Dierker & Kavanaugh, P.C.	53	99.3
3	Commvault Systems, Inc.	74	99.1
4	Harrity & Harrity, LLP	1274	98.9
5	The Pattani Law Group	139	98.1
6	Lindauer Law, PLLC	70	98
7	Holland & Hart LLP	1596	97.1
8	Duft & Bornsen, PC	137	97
9	QUALCOMM Incorporated	538	96.3
10	Ferguson Braswell Fraser Kubasta PC	119	96.3
11	GTC Law Group PC & Affiliates	132	96.2
12	Getz Balich LLC	178	96.1
13	Neustel Law Offices	85	95.1
14	MLO, a professional corp.	91	94.3
15	Rowand LLP	121	94.1
16	Garlick & Markison	256	94
17	KILE PARK REED & HOUTTEMAN PLLC	414	93.7
18	BEHMKE INNOVATION GROUP LLC	143	93.4
19	Talem IP Law, LLP	52	92.4
20	Farjami & Farjami LLP	63	92
21	Robinson Intellectual Property Law Office	184	91.9
22	KENJA IP LAW PC	159	91.5
23	Kubota & Basol LLP	104	90.9
24	Alleman Hall Creasman & Tuttle LLP	418	90.7
25	Pierce Atwood LLP	184	89.8
26	Guntin & Gust, PLC	251	89.5
27	CKC & Partners Co., LLC	478	89.4
28	Innovation Counsel LLP	336	89.1
29	Global IP Counselors, LLP	559	88.9
30	ALG Intellectual Property, LLC	120	88.8
31	Carrier, Shende & Associates P.C.	147	88.7
32	Patterson + Sheridan, LLP	1591	88.7
33	KLIGLER & ASSOCIATES PATENT ATTORNEYS LTD	188	88.4
34	Yee & Associates, P.C.	175	88.2
35	IP Spring	100	88.2
36	ARC IP Law, PC	54	87.7
37	Parker Justiss, P.C.	85	87.2
38	Cramer Patent & Design, PLLC	64	87.2
39	The Small Patent Law Group LLC	286	87.1
40	Intellectual Valley Law, P.C.	50	86.7
41	POSZ LAW GROUP, PLC	391	86.3
42	Alleman Hall & Tuttle LLP	51	86.2
43	Konrad Raynes Davda & Victor LLP	68	85.9
44	Keating & Bennett, LLP	644	85.8
45	Burris Law, PLLC	287	85.7
46	CHIP LAW GROUP	711	85.5
47	Darrow Mustafa PC	228	85.4
48	McGarry Bair PC	279	85.3
49	SOLARIS Intellectual Property Group, PLLC	103	85.2
50	Christopher P. Maiorana, PC	54	85.2

Patent Quality Rankings Methodology. 

The Patent Quality Rankings are based only on average errors in issued patents and don't address other important aspects of patent quality. 

For purpose of computing quality scores, we used only numbering errors, antecedent basis errors, and word support errors (words that don't appear in the detailed description).

Although we may over- or under-count errors in an individual patent, the average number of errors across all of a firm's patents is a good indicator of the overall quality of the firm's work. 

Learn more about our methodology.

Product Updates: OA Response Shell Generator

You invest a lot of valuable time in USPTO office actions, so we've been investing our time in streamlining your work via our OA Admin tool.

The latest additions to OA Admin are our OA Response Shell Generator and IDS Form Filler features. OA Response Shell Generator helps you by ...

• Allowing you to upload custom shell templates or use our default shell template.
• Populating info like application number, confirmation number, examiner, etc.
• Inserting a clean version of claims with reset claim status and amendments. Coming soon!

At the 4:20 mark of the video below, you'll get an OA Admin refresher including step-by-step overviews of OA Response Shell Generator and IDS Form Filler.  

These exciting additions to OA Admin are available now with a Patent Bots Prep & Pros Pro subscription. 

Demo: Fall in Love with OA Response Shell Generation from Patent Bots on Vimeo.

Product Updates: 2023 New Features Review

Last year was a big one at Patent Bots! Before you take on 2024, check out the video below for a quick review of our top new features of 2023.

In just about 15 minutes, you'll learn how to ...

• Use GPT to generate text for key sections of your patent application.
• Automatically complete SB/08a Information Disclosure Statement forms.
• Log into the USPTO Patent Center from inside Patent Bots Office Action tools.
• View the assignees of cited prior art (to avoid arguing against a client’s own prior art).
• Convert Microsoft Word track changes to overstrikes and underlines.
• Set claim status identifiers to Currently Amended for all amended claims.
• Generate a claim summary sentence for the Remarks section of an OA response.
• Create PowerPoint and Visio flowcharts from method claims.

2023 New Features Review from Patent Bots on Vimeo.

Product Updates: Automatic IDS Form Completion and More

Who wants to spend their time entering data into forms? 

Our NEW Office Action Admin tool automatically completes your SB/08a Information Disclosure Statement form! Simply add your application number and the prior art patent numbers and we’ll fill out the form. 

See how it works at the 7:15 mark of the video below. Elsewhere in the video, you'll learn how to…

• View the assignees of cited prior art (to avoid arguing against a client’s own prior art) at the 5:30 mark.
• Log into the USPTO Patent Center from inside Patent Bots Office Action tools at the 9:20 mark.
• Get more from your Patent Bots investment with refreshers on all four of our products at the 17:30 mark.

These exciting new features are available now with a Patent Bots Prep & Pros Pro subscription. 

IDS Form Completion Simplified from Patent Bots on Vimeo.

2023 Patent Quality Rankings: The Top 50 Companies

Patent Bots is pleased to announce its fourth annual Patent Quality Rankings of top companies. (We previously announced our Top 50 patent law firms and our Top 10 firms by Tech Center.)

We reviewed every patent issued by the USPTO in the past year – over 320,000! – using our advanced machine learning software. 

We then ranked more than 750 companies with 50+ patents issued based on the average number of numbering, antecedent basis, and word support errors detected in their patents. Our rankings are based only on these errors and do not address many other important aspects of patent quality. 

Patent Accuracy: By the Numbers.

Before we unveil the Top 50 companies, here's a quick look at the state of patent accuracy.

• 323,393 patents processed by the Patent Bots AI
• 33,425 (10.3%) patents achieved a perfect Patent Quality Score
• 7.9 average errors per patent
• 5 median errors per patent

Nearly 290,000 (90%) of all patents issued in the last year contained at least one numbering, antecedent basis, or word support error. There is clearly room for improved accuracy in the industry.

That is why Patent Bots created the world's fastest and most accurate patent drafting and proofreading solution. Try Patent Bots FREE for 14 days.

Now, on to the rankings! 

2023 Patent Quality Rankings: Top 10 Large Companies.

Nanya Technology ranked first among companies with 250+ patents issued in the last year. 

Pioneer Hi-Bred International and Qualcomm ranked second and third, respectively, among large companies. They were followed by Juniper Networks, Citrix Systems, NTT Docomo, Yazaki, Seiko Epson, Toyota, and Sharp. 

Congratulations to Nanya Technology and the rest of these large companies for doing amazing work over the last year! 

2023 Patent Quality Rankings: Top 10 Mid-Sized Companies. 

Large companies don't have a monopoly on patent accuracy. Among mid-sized companies with between 100 and 249 patents issued, the top three patent quality scores were held by Ofinno, Commvault, and Zoox, respectively. 

They were followed by JTEKT, InnoLux, Yamaha, United Microelectronics, Uber (UATC), Haier US Appliances, and AISIN.

2023 Patent Quality Rankings: Top 50 Companies Overall. 

And, now, it's time to unveil the Top 50 companies with 50+ patents issued in the last year!

If you don't see your company on the list below, review our full list inside our PatentVerse. You'll need to log in to see your company's ranking as we don't want to publicly identify companies with lower scores.

Rank	Company	Patents Issued	Quality Score
1	SIGMASENSE, LLC.	58	99.7
2	Strong Force IoT Portfolio 2016, LLC	78	99.2
3	Ofinno, LLC	137	98.7
4	Commvault Systems, Inc.	134	98.2
5	Zoox, Inc.	173	98.2
6	Rohr, Inc.	73	97.9
7	UAB 360 IT	50	97.5
8	OneTrust, LLC	68	97.1
9	JTEKT CORPORATION	110	97
10	PEGATRON CORPORATION	56	96.7
11	HITACHI CONSTRUCTION MACHINERY CO., LTD.	55	96.4
12	NANYA TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION	269	95.9
13	Inventec (Pudong) Technology Corporation	67	95.8
14	InnoLux Corporation	224	95.6
15	PIONEER HI-BRED INTERNATIONAL, INC.	271	95.3
16	BOMBARDIER INC.	50	94.6
17	Transportation IP Holdings, LLC	68	94.5
18	YAMAHA HATSUDOKI KABUSHIKI KAISHA	137	94.3
19	NIDEC SANKYO CORPORATION	62	93.4
20	ZEON CORPORATION	91	93.3
21	Midea Group Co., Ltd.	51	93
22	UNITED MICROELECTRONICS CORP.	211	92.8
23	UATC, LLC	111	92.7
24	Johnson Controls Tyco IP Holdings LLP	78	92.2
25	Rubrik, Inc.	63	92.1
26	Turner Broadcasting System, Inc.	59	91.8
27	SILICON WORKS CO., LTD.	83	91.6
28	QUALCOMM Incorporated	2931	91.5
29	Haier US Appliance Solutions, Inc.	196	91.4
30	AISIN CORPORATION	184	91.4
31	Shimano Inc.	110	90.7
32	Hitachi Astemo, Ltd.	58	90.5
33	Primax Electronics Ltd.	55	90.3
34	Juniper Networks, Inc.	288	90.3
35	GOODRICH CORPORATION	163	90.2
36	Toyo Tire Corporation	53	90.2
37	KAWASAKI JUKOGYO KABUSHIKI KAISHA	138	90
38	Citrix Systems, Inc.	349	90
39	JAPAN AVIATION ELECTRONICS INDUSTRY, LIMITED	69	89.9
40	NTT DOCOMO, INC.	270	89.9
41	Yazaki Corporation	265	89.6
42	SEIKO EPSON CORPORATION	1240	89.4
43	Synaptics Incorporated	75	89.3
44	TOYOTA JIDOSHA KABUSHIKI KAISHA	2059	89.1
45	DONGWOO FINE-CHEM CO., LTD.	52	88.9
46	SHOPIFY INC.	62	88.3
47	DexCom, Inc.	59	88.2
48	SHARP KABUSHIKI KAISHA	593	88
49	KABUSHIKI KAISHA TOYOTA JIDOSHOKKI	73	87.9
50	BETA AIR, LLC	112	87.6

Patent Quality Rankings Methodology.

The Patent Quality Rankings are based only on average errors in issued patents and don't address other important aspects of patent quality. 

For purpose of computing quality scores, we used only numbering errors, antecedent basis errors, and word support errors (words that don't appear in the detailed description).

Although we may over- or under-count errors in an individual patent, the average number of errors across all of a company's patents is a good indicator of the overall quality of the company's portfolio. 

Learn more about our methodology.