Monday, July 7, 2025
To Gen AI or Not to Gen AI? Automation in Patent Drafting Tools
Wednesday, June 18, 2025
Webinar: Drafting to Due Diligence
Due diligence work requires reviewing and comparing a wide variety of information (claims, office actions, etc.), and doing this manually is slow and tedious.
In this webinar, GTC Law Group shares how they use tools like PatentPlex to get quick access to the information they need, allowing them to spend more time on substantive work and less time shuffling papers.
As a bonus, GTC Law Group is also #1 in the 2025 Patent Bots quality rankings as measured by proofreading errors in issued patents.
During the presentation, GTC explains the importance of patent quality and the processes that they have implemented to ensure the entire law firm is doing quality work.
Thursday, June 12, 2025
Patent Bots Drafting Automation in Action: Claims Renumbering
You may know Prep & Pros Pro from Patent Bots for automated proofreading, but did you know that it includes drafting automation as well?
These tools increase your efficiency by automating tedious tasks when drafting patent applications and OA responses. Drafting automation includes the following features designed to save you valuable time and reduce errors.
- Claim renumbering
- Insertion or removal of ref labels from claims
- Figure renumbering
- Typing shortcuts for ref labels
- Ref label renumbering
- Generation of claim summaries
- Generation of the brief description of the figures
Today, we’re taking a closer look at claim renumbering and sharing just how easy it is to use. With one click of a button, the tool makes sure that all of your claims are in numerical order and automatically updates your claim dependencies.
See claim renumbering in action in the video below. Then try it, along with the other great drafting features, with a free two-week trial of Patent Bots.
Wednesday, June 4, 2025
2025 Patent Quality Rankings: Top 10 Firms in Each USPTO Tech Center
Patent Bots recently announced its latest Patent Quality Rankings of top patent law firms. In April, we unveiled the Top 50 Patent Firms.
Today, we're excited to share the Top 10 firms in each USPTO Tech Center.
As we've done every year since 2020, we used our advanced machine learning software to review every patent issued – more than 314,00 this year! – by the USPTO in the past year.
We then ranked patent firms in each Tech Center based on the average number of numbering, antecedent basis, and word support errors detected in their patents. Our rankings are based only on the above errors and do not address many other important aspects of patent quality.
More than 275,000 (88%) of patents issued contained at least one detectable error. If your firm doesn't use automated proofreading, try Patent Bots FREE for 14 days.
Now, on to the rankings!
Top 10 Patent Firms in Tech Center 1600
Technology Center 1600 covers patent applications in the fields of Biotechnology and Organic fields. Congratulations to Nath, Goldberg & Myer for earning the top Patent Bots Quality Ranking in Tech Center 1600 for 2025.
RANK | FIRM | COUNT | SCORE |
1 | Nath, Goldberg & Meyer | 373 | 100 |
2 | Tarolli, Sundheim, Covell & Tummino LLP | 50 | 98.9 |
3 | Sughrue Mion, PLLC | 176 | 98.8 |
4 | Perkins Coie LLP | 60 | 93 |
5 | Meunier Carlin & Curfman LLC | 103 | 92.9 |
6 | Oblon, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, L.L.P. | 177 | 92.7 |
7 | Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP | 101 | 89.7 |
8 | Choate, Hall & Stewart LLP | 62 | 89.1 |
9 | Fox Rothschild LLP | 99 | 86.2 |
10 | Polsinelli PC | 146 | 82.2 |
Top 10 Patent Firms in Tech Center 1700
Technology Center 1700 covers patent applications in the fields of Chemical and Materials Engineering fields. Congratulations to KENJAR IP LAW PC for earning the top Patent Bots Quality Ranking in Tech Center 1700 for 2025.
RANK | FIRM | COUNT | SCORE |
1 | KENJA IP LAW PC | 119 | 99.5 |
2 | Global IP Counselors, LLP | 52 | 97.8 |
3 | BURR PATENT LAW, PLLC | 71 | 97 |
4 | Slater Matsil, LLP | 70 | 94.2 |
5 | Nath, Goldberg & Meyer | 185 | 93.8 |
6 | Lee IP Law, P.C. | 62 | 93.1 |
7 | IPUSA, PLLC | 58 | 92.6 |
8 | Rimon P.C. | 154 | 92.1 |
9 | Fish & Richardson P.C. | 368 | 90 |
10 | Wenderoth, Lind & Ponack, L.L.P. | 246 | 89.8 |
Top 10 Patent Firms in Tech Center 2100
Technology Center 2100 covers patent applications in the fields of Computer Architecture Software and Information Security. Congratulations to FIG. 1 Patents for earning the top Patent Bots Quality Rankings in Tech Center 2100 for 2025.
RANK | FIRM | COUNT | SCORE |
1 | FIG. 1 Patents | 79 | 99.9 |
2 | Harrity & Harrity, LLP | 93 | 99.7 |
3 | Holland & Hart LLP | 295 | 99.7 |
4 | Commvault Systems, Inc. | 55 | 99.6 |
5 | Flagship Patents | 50 | 98.3 |
6 | Renaissance IP Law Group LLP | 63 | 95.7 |
7 | Jaffery Watson Mendonsa & Hamilton LLP | 83 | 95.4 |
8 | Lowenstein Sandler LLP | 255 | 92.7 |
9 | Keller Preece PLLC | 71 | 91 |
10 | Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP | 76 | 90.9 |
Top 10 Patent Firms in Tech Center 2400
Technology Center 2400 covers patent applications in the fields of Computer Networks, Multiplex, Cable and Cryptography/Security. Congratulations to Harrity & Harrity, LLP for earning the top Patent Bots Quality Ranking in Tech Center 2400 for 2025.
RANK | FIRM | COUNT | SCORE |
1 | Harrity & Harrity, LLP | 485 | 99.9 |
2 | BEHMKE INNOVATION GROUP LLC | 85 | 99.9 |
3 | Edell, Shapiro & Finnan, LLC | 102 | 99.5 |
4 | The Pattani Law Group | 71 | 99.5 |
5 | Holland & Hart LLP | 659 | 99.3 |
6 | QUALCOMM Incorporated | 211 | 97.8 |
7 | Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch LLP | 221 | 97 |
8 | Osha Bergman Watanabe & Burton LLP | 215 | 96.6 |
9 | ArentFox Schiff LLP | 390 | 95.9 |
10 | Shumaker & Sieffert, P.A. | 275 | 91.7 |
Top 10 Patent Firms in Tech Center 2600
Technology Center 2600 covers patent applications in the fields of Communications. Congratulations to Harrity & Harrity, LLP for earning the top Patent Bots Quality Ranking in Tech Center 2600 for 2025.
RANK | FIRM | COUNT | SCORE |
1 | Harrity & Harrity, LLP | 174 | 99.9 |
2 | FIG. 1 Patents | 90 | 99.9 |
3 | Holland & Hart LLP | 148 | 99.1 |
4 | Kubota & Basol LLP | 72 | 99 |
5 | Jaffery Watson Mendonsa & Hamilton LLP | 62 | 98.2 |
6 | Weaver Austin Villeneuve & Sampson LLP | 53 | 97.7 |
7 | Keller Preece PLLC | 93 | 97.4 |
8 | Garlick & Markison | 60 | 96.7 |
9 | CKC & Partners Co., LLC | 64 | 96.1 |
10 | Edell, Shapiro & Finnan, LLC | 64 | 96 |
Top 10 Patent Firms in Tech Center 2800
Technology Center 2800 covers patent applications in the fields of Semiconductors, Electrical and Optical Systems and Components. Congratulations to Holland & Hart LLP for earning the top Patent Bots Quality Ranking in Tech Center 2800 for 2025.
RANK | FIRM | COUNT | SCORE |
1 | Holland & Hart LLP | 157 | 99.6 |
2 | CHIP LAW GROUP | 230 | 99.4 |
3 | Garlick & Markison | 58 | 99.3 |
4 | Akona IP PC | 87 | 97.9 |
5 | Venjuris, P.C. | 139 | 97.4 |
6 | Robinson Intellectual Property Law Office, P.C. | 124 | 97 |
7 | Innovation Counsel LLP | 134 | 96.4 |
8 | Cha & Reiter, LLC | 73 | 95.2 |
9 | Jefferson IP Law, LLP | 117 | 95.1 |
10 | Lowenstein Sandler LLP | 166 | 95.1 |
Top 10 Patent Firms in Tech Center 3600
Technology Center 3600 covers patent applications in the fields of Transportation, Electronic Commerce, Construction, Agriculture, Licensing and Review. Congratulations to Harrity & Harrity, LLP for earning the top Patent Bots Quality Ranking in Tech Center 3600 for 2025.
RANK | FIRM | COUNT | SCORE |
1 | Harrity & Harrity, LLP | 113 | 99.6 |
2 | Keating & Bennett, LLP | 167 | 99.5 |
3 | The Small Patent Law Group LLC | 61 | 99.3 |
4 | BCF LLP | 61 | 99.1 |
5 | Burris Law, PLLC | 55 | 98.6 |
6 | Darrow Mustafa PC | 51 | 97.6 |
7 | Paratus Law Group, PLLC | 81 | 97 |
8 | Young Basile Hanlon & MacFarlane, P.C. | 144 | 96.4 |
9 | IPUSA, PLLC | 83 | 95.8 |
10 | Bejin Bieneman PLC | 126 | 95.3 |
Top 10 Patent Firms in Tech Center 3700
Technology Center 3700 covers patent applications in the fields of Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing and Products. Congratulations to Getz Balich LLC for earning the top Patent Bots Quality Ranking in Tech Center 3700 for 2025.
RANK | FIRM | COUNT | SCORE |
1 | Getz Balich LLC | 167 | 100 |
2 | STAAS & HALSEY LLP | 75 | 99.8 |
3 | Paratus Law Group, PLLC | 52 | 99.5 |
4 | Posz Law Group, PLC | 124 | 98.5 |
5 | Burris Law, PLLC | 73 | 97.6 |
6 | Keating & Bennett, LLP | 50 | 96.1 |
7 | Lempia Summerfield Katz LLC | 111 | 94.1 |
8 | Slater Matsil, LLP | 56 | 94.1 |
9 | McGarry Bair PC | 92 | 94 |
10 | Rimon P.C. | 104 | 93.1 |
Patent Quality Rankings Methodology
The Patent Quality Rankings are based only on average errors in issued patents and don't address other important aspects of patent quality.
For the purpose of computing quality scores, we used only numbering errors, antecedent basis errors, and word support errors (words that don't appear in the detailed description).
Although we may over- or under-count errors in an individual patent, the average number of errors across all of a firm's patents is a good indicator of the overall quality of the firm's work.
Learn more about our methodology.