Top 10 Patent Firms in Tech Center 1600.
Technology Center 1600 covers patent applications in the fields of Biotechnology and Organic fields. Congratulations to Nath, Goldberg & Meyer for earning the top Patent Bots Quality Ranking in Tech Center 1600 for 2024!
Rank | Firm | Count | Score |
1 | Nath, Goldberg & Meyer | 241 | 98.8 |
2 | TAROLLI, SUNDHEIM, COVELL & TUMMINO L.L.P. | 50 | 98 |
3 | Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP | 111 | 95.3 |
4 | Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP | 88 | 94.3 |
5 | Sughrue Mion, PLLC | 198 | 93.7 |
6 | Dinsmore & Shohl LLP | 66 | 89.3 |
7 | Meunier Carlin & Curfman LLC | 109 | 88.8 |
8 | Banner & Witcoff, Ltd. | 64 | 87.6 |
9 | Ballard Spahr LLP | 59 | 86.5 |
10 | Greenberg Traurig, LLP | 97 | 86.4 |
Top 10 Patent Firms in Tech Center 1700.
Technology Center 1700 covers patent applications in the fields of Chemical and Materials Engineering fields. Congratulations to CKC & Partners Co. for earning the top Patent Bots Quality Ranking in Tech Center 1700 for 2024!
Rank | Firm | Count | Score |
1 | CKC & Partners Co., LLC | 58 | 98.9 |
2 | Lempia Summerfield Katz LLC | 51 | 97.1 |
3 | ScienBiziP, P.C. | 51 | 96.4 |
4 | Global IP Counselors, LLP | 73 | 94.9 |
5 | KENJA IP LAW PC | 96 | 94.4 |
6 | Li & Cai Intellectual Property (USA) Office | 50 | 93.5 |
7 | McGarry Bair PC | 78 | 92.3 |
8 | Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP | 58 | 91.5 |
9 | NSIP Law | 58 | 91.4 |
10 | Lee IP Law, P.C. | 75 | 91 |
Top 10 Patent Firms in Tech Center 2100.
Technology Center 2100 covers patent applications in the fields of Computer Architecture Software and Information Security. Congratulations to Holland & Hart for earning the top Patent Bots Quality Rankings in Tech Center 2100 for 2024!
Rank | Firm | Count | Score |
1 | Holland & Hart LLP | 326 | 99.9 |
2 | FIG. 1 Patents | 82 | 99.6 |
3 | Commvault Systems, Inc. | 60 | 99.6 |
4 | Harrity & Harrity, LLP | 61 | 99.5 |
5 | Lowenstein Sandler LLP | 436 | 93.5 |
6 | Young Basile Hanlon & MacFarlane, P.C. | 57 | 93 |
7 | Muirhead and Saturnelli, LLC | 56 | 92.6 |
8 | Garlick & Markison | 91 | 92.4 |
9 | Patterson + Sheridan, LLP | 217 | 91.8 |
10 | Renaissance IP Law Group LLP | 72 | 91.8 |
Top 10 Patent Firms in Tech Center 2400.
Technology Center 2400 covers patent applications in the fields of Computer Networks, Multiplex, Cable and Cryptography/Security. Congratulations to Harrity & Harrity for earning the top Patent Bots Quality Ranking in Tech Center 2400 for 2024!
Rank | Firm | Count | Score |
1 | Harrity & Harrity, LLP | 639 | 99.9 |
2 | Edell, Shapiro & Finnan, LLC | 138 | 99.9 |
3 | Holland & Hart LLP | 781 | 99.8 |
4 | The Pattani Law Group | 135 | 99.6 |
5 | Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch LLP | 226 | 99.1 |
6 | BEHMKE INNOVATION GROUP LLC | 100 | 98.4 |
7 | QUALCOMM Incorporated | 228 | 98.2 |
8 | ArentFox Schiff LLP | 439 | 97.7 |
9 | Moore & Van Allen PLLC | 96 | 95.5 |
10 | ScienBiziP, P.C. | 169 | 91.3 |
Top 10 Patent Firms in Tech Center 2600.
Technology Center 2600 covers patent applications in the fields of Communications. Congratulations to Harrity & Harrity for earning the top Patent Bots Quality Ranking in Tech Center 2600 for 2024!
Rank | Firm | Count | Score |
1 | Harrity & Harrity, LLP | 181 | 99.8 |
2 | FIG. 1 Patents | 86 | 99.6 |
3 | Edell, Shapiro & Finnan, LLC | 79 | 98.5 |
4 | Holland & Hart LLP | 159 | 98 |
5 | KILE PARK REED & HOUTTEMAN PLLC | 102 | 97.8 |
6 | Garlick & Markison | 57 | 97 |
7 | Innovation Counsel LLP | 165 | 96.7 |
8 | QUALCOMM Incorporated | 224 | 96.5 |
9 | Alleman Hall Creasman & Tuttle LLP | 110 | 96.3 |
10 | Pierce Atwood LLP | 129 | 96.2 |
Top 10 Patent Firms in Tech Center 2800.
Technology Center 2800 covers patent applications in the fields of Semiconductors, Electrical and Optical Systems and Components. Congratulations to Garlick & Markison for earning the top Patent Bots Quality Ranking in Tech Center 2800 for 2024!
Rank | Firm | Count | Score |
1 | Garlick & Markison | 52 | 99.8 |
2 | Holland & Hart LLP | 242 | 99.3 |
3 | Akona IP | 114 | 98.6 |
4 | MUGHAL GAUDRY & FRANKLIN PC | 79 | 97.9 |
5 | CHIP LAW GROUP | 180 | 97.6 |
6 | Lee Sullivan Shea & Smith LLP | 84 | 97.4 |
7 | Venjuris, P.C. | 113 | 96.7 |
8 | KILE PARK REED & HOUTTEMAN PLLC | 229 | 96.6 |
9 | Quinn IP Law | 56 | 95.9 |
10 | IPUSA, PLLC | 141 | 95.6 |
Top 10 Patent Firms in Tech Center 3600.
Technology Center 3600 covers patent applications in the fields of Transportation, Electronic Commerce, Construction, Agriculture, Licensing and Review. Congratulations to GTC Law Group for earning the top Patent Bots Quality Ranking in Tech Center 3600 for 2024!
Rank | Firm | Count | Score |
1 | GTC Law Group PC & Affiliates | 52 | 99.8 |
2 | FIG. 1 Patents | 56 | 99.8 |
3 | BCF LLP | 58 | 99.4 |
4 | Bejin Bieneman PLC | 165 | 99.3 |
5 | Harrity & Harrity, LLP | 121 | 99.2 |
6 | Alleman Hall Creasman & Tuttle LLP | 58 | 99 |
7 | Keating & Bennett, LLP | 98 | 98.7 |
8 | Darrow Mustafa PC | 103 | 98.1 |
9 | Paratus Law Group, PLLC | 60 | 96.7 |
10 | Parker Justiss, P.C. | 61 | 96.2 |
Top 10 Patent Firms in Tech Center 3700.
Technology Center 3700 covers patent applications in the fields of Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing and Products. Congratulations to Getz Balich for earning the top Patent Bots Quality Ranking in Tech Center 3700 for 2024!
Rank | Firm | Count | Score |
1 | Getz Balich LLC | 124 | 99.8 |
2 | Keating & Bennett, LLP | 56 | 99.8 |
3 | POSZ LAW GROUP, PLC | 109 | 99 |
4 | Alleman Hall Creasman & Tuttle LLP | 72 | 98.9 |
5 | Lempia Summerfield Katz LLC | 145 | 98.3 |
6 | McCoy Russell LLP | 212 | 97.2 |
7 | Gray Ice Higdon | 50 | 97.1 |
8 | Amin, Turocy & Watson, LLP | 79 | 96.9 |
9 | Snell & Wilmer L.L.P. | 155 | 96.6 |
10 | Paratus Law Group, PLLC | 57 | 96 |
Patent Quality Rankings Methodology.
The Patent Quality Rankings are based only on average errors in issued patents and don't address other important aspects of patent quality.
For purpose of computing quality scores, we used only numbering errors, antecedent basis errors, and word support errors (words that don't appear in the detailed description).
Although we may over- or under-count errors in an individual patent, the average number of errors across all of a firm's patents is a good indicator of the overall quality of the firm's work.
Learn more about our methodology.