Patent Accuracy: By the Numbers.
- 323,393 patents processed by the Patent Bots AI
- 33,425 (10.3%) patents achieved a perfect Patent Quality Score
- 7.9 average errors per patent
- 5 median errors per patent
2023 Patent Quality Rankings: Top 10 Large Firms.
Rank | Law Firm | Patents Issued | Quality Score |
1 | Harrity & Harrity, LLP | 770 | 96.5 |
2 | Holland & Hart LLP | 1081 | 95.3 |
3 | Global IP Counselors, LLP | 509 | 89.4 |
4 | Chip Law Group | 910 | 88.5 |
5 | Hanley, Flight & Zimmerman, LLC | 849 | < 84.3 |
6 | Patterson + Sheridan, LLP | 1606 | < 84.3 |
7 | McDermott Will & Emery LLP | 1238 | < 84.3 |
8 | Lowenstein Sandler LLP | 792 | < 84.3 |
9 | Dority & Manning, P.A. | 1527 | < 84.3 |
10 | Studebaker & Brackett PC | 1248 | < 84.3 |
2023 Patent Quality Rankings: Top 50 Firms Overall.
Large firms don't have a monopoly on patent accuracy. Smaller firms with between 50 and 500 patents granted are doing excellent work as well.
A quick note about the rankings: Some companies file their own patents rather than filing through outside counsel. In these instances, the company is both the patent filer AND the patent owner and is included in our rankings as both a firm and a company. The company rankings will be released later this year.
(If you don't see your firm on the list below, review our full list inside our PatentVerse. You'll need to log in to see your firm's ranking as we don't want to publicly identify firms with lower scores.)
Rank | Law Firm | Patents Issued | Quality Score |
1 | Harrity & Harrity LLP/Qualcomm Incorporated | 74 | 99.9 |
2 | GTC Law Group PC & Affiliates | 167 | 99.7 |
3 | Commvault Systems, Inc. | 78 | 98.9 |
4 | Holland & Hart LLP/Qualcomm Incorporated | 92 | 98.9 |
5 | Hartman & Citrin LLC | 82 | 98.8 |
6 | The Pattani Law Group | 53 | 98.1 |
7 | Lawrence Youst PLLC | 50 | 97.9 |
8 | FIG. 1 Patents | 239 | 97.6 |
9 | Getz Balich LLC | 132 | 97.5 |
10 | Dascenzo Gates Intellectual Property Law, P.C. | 52 | 96.7 |
11 | Duft & Bornsen, PC | 132 | 96.7 |
12 | Harrity & Harrity, LLP | 770 | 96.5 |
13 | Lindauer Law, PLLC | 94 | 96.2 |
14 | Mori & Ward, LLP | 125 | 95.7 |
15 | Holland & Hart LLP | 1081 | 95.3 |
16 | Konrad Raynes Davda & Victor LLP | 109 | 95.1 |
17 | Akona IP PC | 150 | 95 |
18 | Caldwell Intellectual Property Law | 284 | 94 |
19 | Robinson Intellectual Property Law Office | 141 | 93.7 |
20 | Volentine, Whitt & Francos, PLLC | 205 | 93.6 |
21 | Behmke Innovation Group LLC | 143 | 92.5 |
22 | Alleman Hall Creasman & Tuttle LLP | 427 | 92 |
23 | Kolitch Romano Dascenzo Gates LLC | 54 | 92 |
24 | Guntin & Gust, PLC | 449 | 91.8 |
25 | Lanway IPR Services | 110 | 91.5 |
26 | Qualcomm Incorporated | 425 | 91.3 |
27 | Han IP PLLC | 79 | 90.8 |
28 | The Small Patent Law Group LLC | 239 | 90.7 |
29 | Ferguson Braswell Fraser Kubasta PC | 136 | 90.3 |
30 | Pramudji Law Group PLLC | 64 | 89.8 |
31 | Cha & Reiter, LLC | 284 | 89.8 |
32 | Garlick & Markison | 213 | 89.8 |
33 | Kenja IP Law PC | 206 | 89.4 |
34 | Global IP Counselors, LLP | 509 | 89.4 |
35 | Solaris Intellectual Property Group, PLLC | 83 | 89.3 |
36 | Rowand LLP | 98 | 89.3 |
37 | McGarry Bair PC | 244 | 89.2 |
38 | Keller Preece PLLC | 240 | 89.2 |
39 | Darrow Mustafa PC | 296 | 89.2 |
40 | Chip Law Group | 910 | 88.5 |
41 | Dierker & Kavanaugh PC | 51 | 87.6 |
42 | Neustel Law Offices | 85 | 87.4 |
43 | Fernando & Partners, LLP | 126 | 87.1 |
44 | Brient IP Law, LLC | 85 | 86.2 |
45 | Innovation Counsel LLP | 299 | 86.1 |
46 | Kile Park Reed & Houtteman PLLC | 317 | 85.6 |
47 | Servilla Whitney LLC | 225 | 85 |
48 | Renaissance IP Law Group LLP | 161 | 84.9 |
49 | Novak Druce Carroll LLP | 50 | 84.3 |
50 | Kubota & Basol LLP | 110 | 84.3 |
Patent Quality Rankings Methodology.
The Patent Quality Rankings are based only on average errors in issued patents and don't address other important aspects of patent quality.
For purpose of computing quality scores, we used only numbering errors, antecedent basis errors, and word support errors (words that don't appear in the detailed description).
Although we may over- or under-count errors in an individual patent, the average number of errors across all of a firm's patents is a good indicator of the overall quality of the firm's work.
Learn more about our methodology.