Wednesday, October 16, 2024

Q&A with FIG. 1 Patents Founders Mark Niemann and Patrick Walsh

Mark Niemann and Patrick Walsh founded FIG. 1 Patents in 2021 with a focus on quality. That focus paid off this spring as FIG. 1 earned the top spot in our 2024 Patent Quality Rankings of patent law firms with 50+ patents issued in the previous year. 

FIG. 1, which has used Patent Bots proofreading since 2022, achieved a 99.6 patent quality score across 266 patents obtained. In addition to its top ranking among firms with 50+ patents, the firm also ranked second for USPTO Tech Centers 2100, 2600, and 3600.

Mark and Patrick recently shared their insights on patent quality and the strategies that led to their top ranking. The interview has been edited for length and clarity.


Patent Bots: First of all, congratulations on placing first in the rankings. Why is patent quality such a priority for your firm? 

Mark: Thank you! For us, it’s a fundamental mindset. When we established the firm, we believed that a strong emphasis on quality would set us apart from larger firms.

Producing error-free work is an established expectation within our firm. Our talented attorneys are committed to using Patent Bots for proofreading, and every piece of work is also reviewed by a partner who also employs the tool. We don’t send out work unless it meets our standard for quality.


PB: Your firm ranked 25th in 2022 before you even began using Patent Bots. So, obviously, there’s more to quality than technology.

Patrick: Absolutely. Since our founding, one of our pillars has been drafting high quality patents without these errors. The reason we landed in the rankings initially is because we were doing the things that good patent attorneys are trained to do.

Patent Bots helped us rise to that next level and improve from a 90.8 score in 2022 to 99.6 in 2024. When you’re proofreading an application manually, it’s pretty easy to miss one or two little errors. Patent Bots prevents that from happening and helps you get that last little bit closer to error-free.

It's like running spell check on a 50-page document. You see the squiggly lines on your screen and you immediately see that something’s not right in your document.


PB: How do you incorporate your commitment to quality into your sales efforts? Are your clients aware of your high ranking?

Patrick: They’re totally aware of it. We promote our ranking in our marketing materials and we’ve even had potential clients reach out to us after initially seeing us in the rankings.

We don’t hide the fact that we use Patent Bots. When we send the patent draft to the client, we also often send a PDF of the Patent Bots proofreading report along with it. Some of our clients have even asked us to run reports on issued patents that were prepared by other firms to determine how well they’re positioned with an asset to weigh various portfolio strategies involving the asset.


PB: We use the phrase Patent Quality Rankings but there’s obviously more to patent quality than removing errors. How do you view the idea of patent quality? 

Mark: That’s absolutely correct. Our clients' continued business demonstrates their trust in us to deliver value beyond just error-free patents.

They rely on us to draft strong patents with strategic claims. They trust us to position their patents competitively in the market.

So for us, quality extends far beyond merely avoiding errors. Producing error-free work is just the first layer.

That said, if a firm scores low in the Patent Quality Rankings, what does it say about the deeper substance of that work?

Tuesday, June 4, 2024

2024 Patent Quality Rankings: Top 10 Firms in Each USPTO Tech Center

Patent Bots recently announced its fifth annual Patent Quality Rankings of top patent law firms. In April, we unveiled the Top 50 Patent Firms

Today, we'll announce the Top 10 firms in each USPTO Tech Center. 

As we've done every year since 2020, we used our advanced machine learning software to review every patent issued – nearly 324,000 this year! – by the USPTO in the past year. 

We then ranked patent firms in each Tech Center based on the average number of numbering, antecedent basis, and word support errors detected in their patents. Our rankings are based only on the above errors and do not address many other important aspects of patent quality.

Nearly 287,000 (88%) of patents contained at least one detectable error. If your firm doesn't use automated proofreading, try Patent Bots FREE for 14 days.

Now, on to the rankings! 

2024 Patent Quality Rankings: Top 10 Firms by USPTO Tech Center.

Keep scrolling to view the Top 10 Firms in every USPTO Tech Center. Or, select a Tech Center of interest from the list to jump to that section. 

Top 10 Patent Firms in Tech Center 1600.

Technology Center 1600 covers patent applications in the fields of Biotechnology and Organic fields. Congratulations to Nath, Goldberg & Meyer for earning the top Patent Bots Quality Ranking in Tech Center 1600 for 2024!

Rank Firm Count Score
1Nath, Goldberg & Meyer24198.8
2TAROLLI, SUNDHEIM, COVELL & TUMMINO L.L.P.5098
3Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP11195.3
4Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP8894.3
5Sughrue Mion, PLLC19893.7
6Dinsmore & Shohl LLP6689.3
7Meunier Carlin & Curfman LLC10988.8
8Banner & Witcoff, Ltd.6487.6
9Ballard Spahr LLP5986.5
10Greenberg Traurig, LLP9786.4

Top 10 Patent Firms in Tech Center 1700.

Technology Center 1700 covers patent applications in the fields of Chemical and Materials Engineering fields. Congratulations to CKC & Partners Co. for earning the top Patent Bots Quality Ranking in Tech Center 1700 for 2024! 

Rank Firm Count Score
1CKC & Partners Co., LLC5898.9
2Lempia Summerfield Katz LLC5197.1
3ScienBiziP, P.C.5196.4
4Global IP Counselors, LLP7394.9
5KENJA IP LAW PC9694.4
6Li & Cai Intellectual Property (USA) Office5093.5
7McGarry Bair PC7892.3
8Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP5891.5
9NSIP Law5891.4
10Lee IP Law, P.C.7591

Top 10 Patent Firms in Tech Center 2100.

Technology Center 2100 covers patent applications in the fields of Computer Architecture Software and Information Security. Congratulations to Holland & Hart for earning the top Patent Bots Quality Rankings in Tech Center 2100 for 2024!

Rank Firm Count Score
1Holland & Hart LLP32699.9
2FIG. 1 Patents8299.6
3Commvault Systems, Inc.6099.6
4Harrity & Harrity, LLP6199.5
5Lowenstein Sandler LLP43693.5
6Young Basile Hanlon & MacFarlane, P.C.5793
7Muirhead and Saturnelli, LLC5692.6
8Garlick & Markison9192.4
9Patterson + Sheridan, LLP21791.8
10Renaissance IP Law Group LLP7291.8

Top 10 Patent Firms in Tech Center 2400.

Technology Center 2400 covers patent applications in the fields of Computer Networks, Multiplex, Cable and Cryptography/Security. Congratulations to Harrity & Harrity for earning the top Patent Bots Quality Ranking in Tech Center 2400 for 2024!

Rank Firm Count Score
1Harrity & Harrity, LLP63999.9
2Edell, Shapiro & Finnan, LLC13899.9
3Holland & Hart LLP78199.8
4The Pattani Law Group13599.6
5Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch LLP22699.1
6BEHMKE INNOVATION GROUP LLC10098.4
7QUALCOMM Incorporated22898.2
8ArentFox Schiff LLP43997.7
9Moore & Van Allen PLLC9695.5
10ScienBiziP, P.C.16991.3

Top 10 Patent Firms in Tech Center 2600.

Technology Center 2600 covers patent applications in the fields of Communications. Congratulations to Harrity & Harrity for earning the top Patent Bots Quality Ranking in Tech Center 2600 for 2024!

Rank Firm Count Score
1Harrity & Harrity, LLP18199.8
2FIG. 1 Patents8699.6
3Edell, Shapiro & Finnan, LLC7998.5
4Holland & Hart LLP15998
5KILE PARK REED & HOUTTEMAN PLLC10297.8
6Garlick & Markison5797
7Innovation Counsel LLP16596.7
8QUALCOMM Incorporated22496.5
9Alleman Hall Creasman & Tuttle LLP11096.3
10Pierce Atwood LLP12996.2

Top 10 Patent Firms in Tech Center 2800.

Technology Center 2800 covers patent applications in the fields of Semiconductors, Electrical and Optical Systems and Components. Congratulations to Garlick & Markison for earning the top Patent Bots Quality Ranking in Tech Center 2800 for 2024!

Rank Firm Count Score
1Garlick & Markison5299.8
2Holland & Hart LLP24299.3
3Akona IP11498.6
4MUGHAL GAUDRY & FRANKLIN PC7997.9
5CHIP LAW GROUP18097.6
6Lee Sullivan Shea & Smith LLP8497.4
7Venjuris, P.C.11396.7
8KILE PARK REED & HOUTTEMAN PLLC22996.6
9Quinn IP Law5695.9
10IPUSA, PLLC14195.6

Top 10 Patent Firms in Tech Center 3600.

Technology Center 3600 covers patent applications in the fields of Transportation, Electronic Commerce, Construction, Agriculture, Licensing and Review. Congratulations to GTC Law Group for earning the top Patent Bots Quality Ranking in Tech Center 3600 for 2024!

Rank Firm Count Score
1GTC Law Group PC & Affiliates5299.8
2FIG. 1 Patents5699.8
3BCF LLP5899.4
4Bejin Bieneman PLC16599.3
5Harrity & Harrity, LLP12199.2
6Alleman Hall Creasman & Tuttle LLP5899
7Keating & Bennett, LLP9898.7
8Darrow Mustafa PC10398.1
9Paratus Law Group, PLLC6096.7
10Parker Justiss, P.C.6196.2

Top 10 Patent Firms in Tech Center 3700.

Technology Center 3700 covers patent applications in the fields of Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing and Products. Congratulations to Getz Balich for earning the top Patent Bots Quality Ranking in Tech Center 3700 for 2024!

Rank Firm Count Score
1Getz Balich LLC12499.8
2Keating & Bennett, LLP5699.8
3POSZ LAW GROUP, PLC10999
4Alleman Hall Creasman & Tuttle LLP7298.9
5Lempia Summerfield Katz LLC14598.3
6McCoy Russell LLP21297.2
7Gray Ice Higdon5097.1
8Amin, Turocy & Watson, LLP7996.9
9Snell & Wilmer L.L.P.15596.6
10Paratus Law Group, PLLC5796


Patent Quality Rankings Methodology. 

The Patent Quality Rankings are based only on average errors in issued patents and don't address other important aspects of patent quality. 

For purpose of computing quality scores, we used only numbering errors, antecedent basis errors, and word support errors (words that don't appear in the detailed description).

Although we may over- or under-count errors in an individual patent, the average number of errors across all of a firm's patents is a good indicator of the overall quality of the firm's work. 

Learn more about our methodology.




Tuesday, May 28, 2024

Product Updates: IDS Form Filling Enhancements and More

Since launching IDS Form Filling six months ago, we’ve rolled out several enhancements that you may have missed. In our upcoming webinar, you’ll learn how to …

  • Import all references cited in any public patent (US or foreign) or even import the whole family.
  • See a list of previously cited references. We won't add previously cited references to the IDS form.
  • Export your IDS Form as PDF, Word (convert to PDF for submission), or XLS (for your own records).

At the 5:55 mark of the video below, you'll see all the latest enhancements to IDS Form Filling.

IDS Form Filling is available now as part of a Patent Bots Prep & Pros Pro subscription.


IDS Form Filling Enhancements and More from Patent Bots on Vimeo.

Wednesday, April 10, 2024

2024 Patent Quality Rankings: The Top 50 Patent Law Firms

It's been five years since we first sought to quantify the state of patent accuracy in the U.S. Today, Patent Bots is pleased to announce our FIFTH annual Patent Quality Rankings of top patent law firms!

As we've done every year since 2020, we used our advanced machine learning software to review every patent issued  nearly 324,000 this year!  by the USPTO in the past year. 

We then ranked the 730 patent law firms with 50+ patents issued based on the average number of numbering, antecedent basis, and word support errors detected in their patents. Our rankings are based only on these error types and do not address many other important aspects of patent quality. 

Patent Accuracy: By the Numbers.

Before we unveil the top 50 patent law firms, let's take a look at the state of patent accuracy.
  • 323,820 patents processed by the Patent Bots AI
  • 36,824 (11.4%) patents with a perfect Patent Quality Score  up from 10.3% in 2023
  • 6.75 average errors per patent  down from 7.9 in 2023
  • 4 median errors per patent  down from 5 in 2023
The decline in errors per patent is not a one-year phenomenon. In fact, the average has declined nearly 25% in just five years  from 8.9 errors per patent in 2020 to an all-time low of 6.75 this year.

The decrease coincides with the rise of automated patent proofreading tools like Patent Bots Prep & Pros Pro. As more patent attorneys have implemented these tools into their workflows, the prevalence of errors has decreased steadily – and dramatically – year after year. 

That said, nearly 287,000 (88%) of all patents issued in the last year contained at least one numbering, antecedent basis, or word support error. If your firm doesn't use automated proofreading, try Patent Bots FREE for 14 days.

Now, on to the rankings!

2024 Patent Quality Rankings: Top 10 Large Firms.

We've segmented America's most active patent firms (those with at least 500 patents issued in the last year) into a Large Firms list to recognize their prolific patent practices. 

For the full Top 50 ranking of patent firms, keep scrolling! 

For the third consecutive year, Harrity & Harrity held the top spot in the rankings. Congratulations to Harrity & Harrity and the rest of these large firms for doing amazing work over the last year! 

(A quick note about the rankings: Some companies file their own patents rather than filing through outside counsel. In these instances, the company is both the patent filer AND the patent owner and is included in our rankings as both a firm and a company. The company rankings will be released later this year.)



RankLaw FirmPatents IssuedQuality Score
1Harrity & Harrity, LLP127498.9
2Holland & Hart LLP159697.1
3QUALCOMM Incorporated53896.3
4Global IP Counselors, LLP55988.9
5Patterson + Sheridan, LLP159188.7
6Keating & Bennett, LLP64485.8
7CHIP LAW GROUP71185.5
8Lowenstein Sandler LLP1054< 85.2
9Rankin, Hill & Clark LLP605< 85.2
10Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch LLP748< 85.2


2024 Patent Quality Rankings: Top 50 Firms Overall. 

Large firms don't have a monopoly on patent accuracy. In our Top 50 overall rankings, 43 firms had fewer than 500 patents issued, 31 had fewer than 200 issued, and 14 had fewer than 100 issued. 

Congratulations to Patent Bots customer FIG. 1 Patents for jumping all the way from No. 8 in our 2023 rankings to the top of our 2024 list. 

(If you don't see your firm on the list below, review our full list inside our PatentVerse. You'll need to log in to see your firm's ranking as we don't want to publicly identify firms with lower scores.)




RankLaw FirmPatents IssuedQuality Score
1FIG. 1 Patents26699.6
2Dierker & Kavanaugh, P.C.5399.3
3Commvault Systems, Inc.7499.1
4Harrity & Harrity, LLP127498.9
5The Pattani Law Group13998.1
6Lindauer Law, PLLC7098
7Holland & Hart LLP159697.1
8Duft & Bornsen, PC13797
9QUALCOMM Incorporated53896.3
10Ferguson Braswell Fraser Kubasta PC11996.3
11GTC Law Group PC & Affiliates13296.2
12Getz Balich LLC17896.1
13Neustel Law Offices8595.1
14MLO, a professional corp.9194.3
15Rowand LLP12194.1
16Garlick & Markison25694
17KILE PARK REED & HOUTTEMAN PLLC41493.7
18BEHMKE INNOVATION GROUP LLC14393.4
19Talem IP Law, LLP5292.4
20Farjami & Farjami LLP6392
21Robinson Intellectual Property Law Office18491.9
22KENJA IP LAW PC15991.5
23Kubota & Basol LLP10490.9
24Alleman Hall Creasman & Tuttle LLP41890.7
25Pierce Atwood LLP18489.8
26Guntin & Gust, PLC25189.5
27CKC & Partners Co., LLC47889.4
28Innovation Counsel LLP33689.1
29Global IP Counselors, LLP55988.9
30ALG Intellectual Property, LLC12088.8
31Carrier, Shende & Associates P.C.14788.7
32Patterson + Sheridan, LLP159188.7
33KLIGLER & ASSOCIATES PATENT ATTORNEYS LTD18888.4
34Yee & Associates, P.C.17588.2
35IP Spring10088.2
36ARC IP Law, PC5487.7
37Parker Justiss, P.C.8587.2
38Cramer Patent & Design, PLLC6487.2
39The Small Patent Law Group LLC28687.1
40Intellectual Valley Law, P.C.5086.7
41POSZ LAW GROUP, PLC39186.3
42Alleman Hall & Tuttle LLP5186.2
43Konrad Raynes Davda & Victor LLP6885.9
44Keating & Bennett, LLP64485.8
45Burris Law, PLLC28785.7
46CHIP LAW GROUP71185.5
47Darrow Mustafa PC22885.4
48McGarry Bair PC27985.3
49SOLARIS Intellectual Property Group, PLLC10385.2
50Christopher P. Maiorana, PC5485.2


Patent Quality Rankings Methodology. 

The Patent Quality Rankings are based only on average errors in issued patents and don't address other important aspects of patent quality. 

For purpose of computing quality scores, we used only numbering errors, antecedent basis errors, and word support errors (words that don't appear in the detailed description).

Although we may over- or under-count errors in an individual patent, the average number of errors across all of a firm's patents is a good indicator of the overall quality of the firm's work. 

Learn more about our methodology.

Tuesday, February 20, 2024

Product Updates: OA Response Shell Generator

You invest a lot of valuable time in USPTO office actions, so we've been investing our time in streamlining your work via our OA Admin tool.

The latest additions to OA Admin are our OA Response Shell Generator and IDS Form Filler features. OA Response Shell Generator helps you by ...

  • Allowing you to upload custom shell templates or use our default shell template.
  • Populating info like application number, confirmation number, examiner, etc.
  • Inserting a clean version of claims with reset claim status and amendments. Coming soon!

At the 4:20 mark of the video below, you'll get an OA Admin refresher including step-by-step overviews of OA Response Shell Generator and IDS Form Filler.  

These exciting additions to OA Admin are available now with a Patent Bots Prep & Pros Pro subscription. 


Demo: Fall in Love with OA Response Shell Generation from Patent Bots on Vimeo.

Friday, January 19, 2024

Product Updates: 2023 New Features Review

Last year was a big one at Patent Bots! Before you take on 2024, check out the video below for a quick review of our top new features of 2023.

In just about 15 minutes, you'll learn how to ...

  • Use GPT to generate text for key sections of your patent application.
  • Automatically complete SB/08a Information Disclosure Statement forms.
  • Log into the USPTO Patent Center from inside Patent Bots Office Action tools.
  • View the assignees of cited prior art (to avoid arguing against a client’s own prior art).
  • Convert Microsoft Word track changes to overstrikes and underlines.
  • Set claim status identifiers to Currently Amended for all amended claims.
  • Generate a claim summary sentence for the Remarks section of an OA response.
  • Create PowerPoint and Visio flowcharts from method claims.

2023 New Features Review from Patent Bots on Vimeo.

Sunday, December 17, 2023

Product Updates: Automatic IDS Form Completion and More

Who wants to spend their time entering data into forms? 

Our NEW Office Action Admin tool automatically completes your SB/08a Information Disclosure Statement form! Simply add your application number and the prior art patent numbers and we’ll fill out the form. 

See how it works at the 7:15 mark of the video below. Elsewhere in the video, you'll learn how to…

  • View the assignees of cited prior art (to avoid arguing against a client’s own prior art) at the 5:30 mark.
  • Log into the USPTO Patent Center from inside Patent Bots Office Action tools at the 9:20 mark.
  • Get more from your Patent Bots investment with refreshers on all four of our products at the 17:30 mark.

These exciting new features are available now with a Patent Bots Prep & Pros Pro subscription. 

IDS Form Completion Simplified from Patent Bots on Vimeo.