- 322,000 patents processed by the Patent Bots AI
- 16,434 patents achieved a perfect Patent Bots Quality Score
- 11.2 average errors per patent
- 7 median errors per patent
2022 Patent Quality Rankings: Top 10 Large Firms.
Rank of Large Firms | Overall Rank | Law Firm | No. of Issued Patents | Quality Score |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 5 | Harrity & Harrity, LLP | 536 | 97.8 |
2 | 20 | Chip Law Group | 877 | 91.8 |
3 | 27 | Holland & Hart LLP | 882 | 90.6 |
4 | 39 | Keating & Bennett, LLP | 652 | 88.1 |
5 | Studebaker & Brackett PC | 1246 | ||
6 | Lee, Hong, Degerman, Kang & Waimey | 596 | ||
7 | McDermott Will & Emery LLP | 1458 | ||
8 | Amin, Turocy & Watson, LLP | 1225 | ||
9 | Hanley, Flight & Zimmerman, LLC | 822 | ||
10 | Lee & Hayes, P.C. | 1045 |
2022 Patent Quality Rankings: Top 50 Firms Overall.
Large firms don't have a monopoly on patent accuracy. Smaller firms with between 50 and 500 patents granted are doing excellent work as well.
(If you don't see your firm on the list below, review our full list inside our PatentVerse. You'll need to log in to see your firm's ranking as we don't want to publicly identify firms with lower scores.)
Rank | Law Firm | No. of Issued Patents | Quality Score |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Lindauer Law, PLLC | 55 | 99.2 |
2 | Holland & Hart LLP/Qualcomm | 57 | 99.2 |
3 | Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc. | 55 | 98.7 |
4 | Robinson Intellectual Property Law Office | 131 | 98.0 |
5 | Harrity & Harrity, LLP | 536 | 97.8 |
6 | Rowand LLP | 83 | 97.8 |
7 | Keller Jolley Preece | 206 | 97.3 |
8 | Strategic Patents, P.C. | 57 | 97.1 |
9 | Hartman & Citrin LLC | 69 | 96.7 |
10 | Patent Capital Group | 254 | 95.0 |
11 | Dascenzo Gates Intellectual Property Law, P.C. | 66 | 94.6 |
12 | GTC Law Group PC & Affiliates | 158 | 94.6 |
13 | Posz Law Group, PLC | 442 | 94.4 |
14 | McGarry Bair PC | 273 | 93.9 |
15 | Compass IP Law PC | 215 | 93.9 |
16 | Allen & Overy LLP | 68 | 93.4 |
17 | Guntin & Gust, PLC | 436 | 93.3 |
18 | Konrad Raynes Davda & Victor LLP | 237 | 93.3 |
19 | Parker Justiss, P.C. | 60 | 92.5 |
20 | Chip Law Group | 877 | 91.8 |
21 | Qualcomm Incorporated | 488 | 91.8 |
22 | Volentine, Whitt & Francos, PLLC | 183 | 91.6 |
23 | Darrow Mustafa PC | 189 | 91.3 |
24 | Adam R. Stephenson, Ltd. | 72 | 91.1 |
25 | FIG. 1 Patents | 255 | 90.8 |
26 | Behmke Innovation Group LLC | 141 | 90.6 |
27 | Holland & Hart LLP | 882 | 90.6 |
28 | Mori & Ward, LLP | 122 | 90.5 |
29 | Caldwell Intellectual Property Law, LLC | 111 | 90.4 |
30 | Tong, Rea, Bentley & Kim, LLC | 66 | 90.4 |
31 | Kenja IP Law PC | 178 | 90.0 |
32 | Duft & Bornsen, PC | 164 | 89.9 |
33 | Dierker & Kavanaugh PC | 66 | 89.4 |
34 | The Small Patent Law Group LLC | 293 | 89.0 |
35 | Global IP Counselors, LLP | 479 | 89.0 |
36 | Alleman Hall Creasman & Tuttle LLP | 476 | 88.6 |
37 | Neustel Law Offices | 69 | 88.4 |
38 | Lawrence Youst PLLC | 61 | 88.3 |
39 | Keating & Bennett, LLP | 652 | 88.1 |
40 | Cha & Reiter, LLC | 285 | 87.8 |
41 | Cuenot, Forsythe & Kim, LLC | 122 | 87.5 |
42 | IP Business Solutions, LLC | 51 | 87.4 |
43 | MLO, a professional corp. | 81 | 86.9 |
44 | Green, Howard & Mughal LLP | 159 | 85.9 |
45 | Treyz Law Group, P.C. | 235 | 85.8 |
46 | Pierce Atwood LLP | 174 | 85.4 |
47 | KED & Associates LLP | 300 | 85.3 |
48 | Arch & Lake LLP | 211 | 84.6 |
49 | Carrier Blackman & Associates, P.C. | 175 | 84.5 |
50 | Chamberlain Hrdlicka | 62 | 84.4 |
Patent Quality Rankings Methodology.
The Patent Quality Rankings are based only on average errors in issued patents and don't address other important aspects of patent quality.
For purpose of computing quality scores, we used only numbering errors, antecedent basis errors, and word support errors (words that don't appear in the detailed description).
Although we may over- or under-count errors in an individual patent, the average number of errors across all of a firm's patents is a good indicator of the overall quality of the firm's work.
Learn more about our methodology.